MomoMACaHoeღ

Family First. PARTY!(: Music, Friends, Boys, And Food<3 Mexican&Flipino(: Sixteen(:

(Source: benatar, via epshii)

nooby-banana:

pippipcheeriotaaraa:

nooby-banana:

pippipcheeriotaaraa:

nooby-banana:

pippipcheeriotaaraa:

galtenoble:

egriz:

nooby-banana:

ivyfairchild:

toughtink:

nooby-banana:

i KNOW i’m just beating a long-dead horse by doing this but for god’s sake disney
fyi only superficial things were changed in the edit (hair, eyelash length, freckles, skin tone) the actual model wasn’t changed at all

to be clear: she photoshopped anna’s hair onto hiro’s mom face. a lot of people in reblogs seem to think that the one on the right is literally anna and trying to find miniscule, non-existant differences… which sort of proves the point? that a picture of a different character can be mistaken for anna so easily with just a hairstyle change and that people will still defend the design choice to the death rather than admit the similarities… sheeesh.

I’m gonna play the devil’s advocate here… So, people are fucking expensive to create and using pre-existing models makes things easier on everyone. Also, if you’ll notice that a lot of people do actually look very similar (not as similar as these two, but still). Typically the differences in a group of people is hair, eyes, skin tone, etc. Disney is under pressure to constantly have films out and if they weren’t it would be different, however they are and with deadlines being so close together and the fact that animated films take 5+ years to make and a lot of fucking money, it will be okay if characters look alike. They all have key characteristics in WHO THEY ARE NOT WHAT THEY LOOK LIKE THAT MAKE THEM SPECIAL. And here I thought that was a common goal.

1. The idea of giant company like Disney using preexisting models for their main characters is not only laughable, but lazy and shameful.
1. Disney has money. They have a LOT of money. They have resources. They have talented people.  And they clearly have enough time to create male characters with distinctive characteristics. The exact same should be true for female characters.
3. Oh look the “it doesn’t matter what they look like, it’s their personality that matters” argument. Movies are a VISUAL MEDIUM. Character design is rooted in figuring out who a character is and then basing the design off that. Good design should give an idea of a character’s personality before even watching the movie.
4. Playing the devil’s advocate only works if your argument makes sense and you understand what you’re arguing. Statements excusing Disney from lazy character design only shows your complete lack of understanding in how the animation industry works.

These people obviously haven’t worked in the industry at all. That is not how computer animation works, especially at a highly funded, enormous company. I mean, look at Dreamworks- Even the background Vikings in the latest film vary a lot from model to model and all have tons of character just to view.
Honestly it’s getting to the point that Disney should be ashamed that it needs people to blindly defend their every move.
As for the people blindly defending it, please understand you can still enjoy things and critique them. Understand that as a visual medium, it’s unacceptable to have so many wildly different characters be identical and possibly even have identical models.
This is not people hating on Disney for no reason, this is people holding Disney to a high standard they established themselves and that fans have come to love.

I don’t think she looks like Anna aside from the eyes. Not to say they look vastly different.
p.s. is Hiro’s mom not Asian? I don’t know the story..

im just gunna throw it out there that whoever made that image actually photoshopped hiro’s aunt’s face to be thinner and more anna-like sooooooo

Hahahahahaha no I definitely didn’t.  If you’re talking about the cheek on the left, looking thinner, that’s an illusion caused by the different hairstyles. They line up pretty much exactly.


then you should have cut out the hair better????? so that it didn’t completely change her face shape????????????????? yea definitely don’t line up pretty much exactly. it aint no ‘illusion’. or! a better idea would have been to use an actual image of anna instead of photoshopping one so that there was an actual comparison…?

oh for fuck’s sake
ok show me where it doesn’t line up. Really. I’m ready. And even if it DOESN’T like up, if you’re gonna argue that making the mom’s face skinnier by maybe 2 pixels is enough to make her look like Anna, you’ve literally proven the point I was trying to make.

I don’t need to show you when it is very easy to see the indent on her left cheek when anna’s hair is photoshopped on???????? comparing hiro’s aunt to an actual picture of anna is quite different than comparing her to your photoshop though? like I aint sayin they don’t have some similarities but it’s a much more compelling argument to use an actual comparison of the characters than one character and then the same character cosplaying as another. here!!! for u

Ok dumb arguments about how off the pixels of her cheek are, I never said anywhere that these characters look exactly the same. The photoshopped version was merely to prove a point.  You even said that there are similarities. Which is LITERALLY my point. Literally. The point. Is that Disney is getting into a rut with character design. The eyes, nose, and mouth, as well as her face, might have small differences but in the end they’re very VERY similar. Again, we are arguing over the pixels of her cheek. If that’s what it comes down to in order to tell characters apart then that’s terrible.

nooby-banana:

pippipcheeriotaaraa:

nooby-banana:

pippipcheeriotaaraa:

nooby-banana:

pippipcheeriotaaraa:

galtenoble:

egriz:

nooby-banana:

ivyfairchild:

toughtink:

nooby-banana:

i KNOW i’m just beating a long-dead horse by doing this but for god’s sake disney

fyi only superficial things were changed in the edit (hair, eyelash length, freckles, skin tone) the actual model wasn’t changed at all

to be clear: she photoshopped anna’s hair onto hiro’s mom face. a lot of people in reblogs seem to think that the one on the right is literally anna and trying to find miniscule, non-existant differences… which sort of proves the point? that a picture of a different character can be mistaken for anna so easily with just a hairstyle change and that people will still defend the design choice to the death rather than admit the similarities… sheeesh.

I’m gonna play the devil’s advocate here… So, people are fucking expensive to create and using pre-existing models makes things easier on everyone. Also, if you’ll notice that a lot of people do actually look very similar (not as similar as these two, but still). Typically the differences in a group of people is hair, eyes, skin tone, etc. Disney is under pressure to constantly have films out and if they weren’t it would be different, however they are and with deadlines being so close together and the fact that animated films take 5+ years to make and a lot of fucking money, it will be okay if characters look alike. They all have key characteristics in WHO THEY ARE NOT WHAT THEY LOOK LIKE THAT MAKE THEM SPECIAL. And here I thought that was a common goal.

1. The idea of giant company like Disney using preexisting models for their main characters is not only laughable, but lazy and shameful.

1. Disney has money. They have a LOT of money. They have resources. They have talented people.  And they clearly have enough time to create male characters with distinctive characteristics. The exact same should be true for female characters.

3. Oh look the “it doesn’t matter what they look like, it’s their personality that matters” argument. Movies are a VISUAL MEDIUM. Character design is rooted in figuring out who a character is and then basing the design off that. Good design should give an idea of a character’s personality before even watching the movie.

4. Playing the devil’s advocate only works if your argument makes sense and you understand what you’re arguing. Statements excusing Disney from lazy character design only shows your complete lack of understanding in how the animation industry works.

These people obviously haven’t worked in the industry at all. That is not how computer animation works, especially at a highly funded, enormous company. I mean, look at Dreamworks- Even the background Vikings in the latest film vary a lot from model to model and all have tons of character just to view.

Honestly it’s getting to the point that Disney should be ashamed that it needs people to blindly defend their every move.

As for the people blindly defending it, please understand you can still enjoy things and critique them. Understand that as a visual medium, it’s unacceptable to have so many wildly different characters be identical and possibly even have identical models.

This is not people hating on Disney for no reason, this is people holding Disney to a high standard they established themselves and that fans have come to love.

I don’t think she looks like Anna aside from the eyes. Not to say they look vastly different.

p.s. is Hiro’s mom not Asian? I don’t know the story..

im just gunna throw it out there that whoever made that image actually photoshopped hiro’s aunt’s face to be thinner and more anna-like sooooooo

Hahahahahaha no I definitely didn’t.  If you’re talking about the cheek on the left, looking thinner, that’s an illusion caused by the different hairstyles. They line up pretty much exactly.

then you should have cut out the hair better????? so that it didn’t completely change her face shape????????????????? yea definitely don’t line up pretty much exactly. it aint no ‘illusion’. or! a better idea would have been to use an actual image of anna instead of photoshopping one so that there was an actual comparison…?

oh for fuck’s sake

ok show me where it doesn’t line up. Really. I’m ready. And even if it DOESN’T like up, if you’re gonna argue that making the mom’s face skinnier by maybe 2 pixels is enough to make her look like Anna, you’ve literally proven the point I was trying to make.

I don’t need to show you when it is very easy to see the indent on her left cheek when anna’s hair is photoshopped on???????? comparing hiro’s aunt to an actual picture of anna is quite different than comparing her to your photoshop though? like I aint sayin they don’t have some similarities but it’s a much more compelling argument to use an actual comparison of the characters than one character and then the same character cosplaying as another. here!!! for u

Ok dumb arguments about how off the pixels of her cheek are, I never said anywhere that these characters look exactly the same. The photoshopped version was merely to prove a point.  You even said that there are similarities. Which is LITERALLY my point. Literally. The point. Is that Disney is getting into a rut with character design. The eyes, nose, and mouth, as well as her face, might have small differences but in the end they’re very VERY similar. Again, we are arguing over the pixels of her cheek. If that’s what it comes down to in order to tell characters apart then that’s terrible.

toughtink:

nooby-banana:

i KNOW i’m just beating a long-dead horse by doing this but for god’s sake disney
fyi only superficial things were changed in the edit (hair, eyelash length, freckles, skin tone) the actual model wasn’t changed at all

to be clear: she photoshopped anna’s hair onto hiro’s mom face. a lot of people in reblogs seem to think that the one on the right is literally anna and trying to find miniscule, non-existant differences… which sort of proves the point? that a picture of a different character can be mistaken for anna so easily with just a hairstyle change and that people will still defend the design choice to the death rather than admit the similarities… sheeesh.

toughtink:

nooby-banana:

i KNOW i’m just beating a long-dead horse by doing this but for god’s sake disney

fyi only superficial things were changed in the edit (hair, eyelash length, freckles, skin tone) the actual model wasn’t changed at all

to be clear: she photoshopped anna’s hair onto hiro’s mom face. a lot of people in reblogs seem to think that the one on the right is literally anna and trying to find miniscule, non-existant differences… which sort of proves the point? that a picture of a different character can be mistaken for anna so easily with just a hairstyle change and that people will still defend the design choice to the death rather than admit the similarities… sheeesh.

(via queen-roxy-lalonde)

(Source: wendynp, via randomfactory)

honeyminttea:

Brigitte Bardot.

honeyminttea:

Brigitte Bardot.

(via hvex)

eurotrottest:

when i think about his stroke game

(Source: inushige)

eurotrottest:

not sorry for the white dick guys

(Source: theamazingmaleshape)

girl-non-grata:

Living with a dog is like having a furry drunk person following you around all the time.

(Source: chaapa-la-pachala, via stepp3nwolf)

(via debt)

(Source: legendoflesli, via stepp3nwolf)

tomhiddlesfrost:

bluekulele:

geekygirlexperience:

arkspaddedroom:

shota-sebby:

all-hiddles-eve:

princessharlequinlaufeyson:

ehehehe…

This is perfect

image

Yes, I thought so too….Had to be done, had to be!

If Frigga was on the Avengers, the movie would have been over in five minutes and have less butts

Bartholomew 

i love this. i cant even- IM FUCKING PISSING MYSELF

(Source: burdened-with-glorious-love, via stepp3nwolf)

jollyidiot:

I have reblogged this at least a thousand times

jollyidiot:

I have reblogged this at least a thousand times

(via stepp3nwolf)

octoberwaffle:

I got bored at work.

(via alternative-pokemon-art)